Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!imagen!atari!portal!uunet!mcvax!ukc!icdoc!qmc-cs!flash
From: flash@cs.qmc.ac.uk (Flash Sheridan)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Procyon old rumors [was: Re: lisp for the macIIx]
Summary: English, looked OK
Keywords: macII, lisp
Message-ID: <875@sequent.cs.qmc.ac.uk>
Date: 5 Mar 89 17:03:32 GMT
References: <6873@zodiac.UUCP> <2674@nunki.usc.edu> <848@sequent.cs.qmc.ac.uk> <3191@cs.dal.ca> <2801@nunki.usc.edu>
Reply-To: @nss.cs.ucl.ac.uk:flash@cs.qmc.ac.uk (Flash Sheridan)
Organization: EE Dept, Queen Mary College, ULondon E1-4NS
Lines: 14

In article <2801@nunki.usc.edu> malczews@castor.usc.edu (Frank Malczewski) writes:
>
>  But does anyone know the story about Procyon CL?
>(P.S.  I love my Allegro Common Lisp; just wish I had the speed of maybe,

I saw a beta copy from a year or so back.  It's produced by a
Cambridge England firm, I think.  The beta wouldn't run on my II.
From the manual, it looked like a good try.  Maybe more high-level
coddling for toolbox stuff than Coral.  I'd be surprised if it were
enough better than Coral to be worth switching, but who knows?
-- 
From: flash@cs.qmc.ac.uk (Flash Sheridan)
Reply-To: sheridan@nss.cs.ucl.ac.uk
Portal,MacNet: FlashsMom