Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!kale
From: kale@m.cs.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: Comparing Prolog with other languag
Message-ID: <5500011@m.cs.uiuc.edu>
Date: 1 Mar 89 14:53:00 GMT
References: <28091@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Lines: 6
Nf-ID: #R:ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU:28091:m.cs.uiuc.edu:5500011:000:289
Nf-From: m.cs.uiuc.edu!kale    Mar  1 08:53:00 1989


Carl: Regarding the speedup you obtained for the Prolog version
of the propositional theorem prover:
Was the speedup due to the native code compilation alone?
If not, what role did the profiler (performance analyzer) play, and
what sort of source to sorce changes you made in the program?