Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!vsi1!lmb
From: lmb@vicom.COM (Larry Blair)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: smail combined with sendmail
Message-ID: <1518@vicom.COM>
Date: 2 Mar 89 00:27:09 GMT
References: <471@manta.pha.pa.us> <1500@ncar.ucar.edu>
Reply-To: lmb@vicom.COM (Larry Blair)
Organization: VICOM Systems Inc., San Jose, CA
Lines: 12

In article <1500@ncar.ucar.edu> woods@handies.UCAR.EDU (Greg Woods) writes:
=In article <471@manta.pha.pa.us> brant@manta.pha.pa.us (Brant Cheikes) writes:
=>Now I can go in and hack the smail source, but I'd like to know if
=>there are any reasons not to.
=
=   I hacked smail to always pass the message to sendmail iff it is called
=as "rmail" but not if called as "smail". It isn't hard to do and I have
=been running it this way since smail first came out and it works fine.

Why not just run the original rmail which, presumably, called sendmail?
-- 
Larry Blair   ames!vsi1!lmb   lmb@vicom.com