Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!pyrnj!dasys1!wfp
From: wfp@dasys1.UUCP (William Phillips)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: Maps Subverted
Keywords: short term, long term, database, sabotage, commercialism, bullshit
Message-ID: <8847@dasys1.UUCP>
Date: 3 Mar 89 06:27:38 GMT
References: <405@mjbtn.MFEE.TN.US> <399@lakart.UUCP> <3661@phri.UUCP> <3008@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <172@deadpup.UUCP>
Reply-To: wfp@dasys1.UUCP (William Phillips)
Organization: Megalopolis Facility for the Utterly Bewildered
Lines: 21

In article <172@deadpup.UUCP> paul@deadpup.UUCP (paul) writes:
>In article <3008@ddsw1.MCS.COM>, karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) writes:
>> Perhaps.  But throwing away the material costs you nothing.

>I must disagree, at least in my case. The local landfill is filling at
>a rapid pace, so the local haulers have a 2 bag per week limit, with
>excess resulting in a surcharge.

Why not just mark the unwanted mail "REFUSED -- RETURN TO SENDER" and
shove it in the mailbox or hand it back to the letter carrier?  You can
do that, you know!  Some of it might even get back to the sender (though
that's highly unlikely) and cause them some annoyance.  It also feels
good!



-- 
William Phillips                 ..![cucard|uunet]!dasys1!wfp
System Co-administrator                       wfp@dasys1.UUCP
BEC Public Excess Unix                      New York, NY, USA
                !!! JUST SAY "NO" TO OS/2 !!!