Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!mcvax!siebren
From: siebren@cwi.nl (Siebren van der Zee)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: (PC) Will the real varargs.h please stand up?
Message-ID: <7940@boring.cwi.nl>
Date: 7 Mar 89 11:41:45 GMT
References: <10287@louie.udel.EDU>
Sender: news@cwi.nl
Organization: CWI, Amsterdam
Lines: 13

In article <10287@louie.udel.EDU> MBECK@ai.ai.mit.edu (Mark Becker) writes:
>Arrrgh.
>
>In going through past postings and installing some of the goodies, I
>just got zonked by two different implementations of varargs.h .
>
>Having multiple versions of this isn't healthy. 

Why? Its behaviour is well defined. What does it matter _HOW_ it is
implemented? As long as does what it is supposed to do I wouldn't
care which one is included.

	Siebren van der Zee, siebren@cwi.nl