Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!sun!pitstop!sundc!seismo!uunet!steinmetz!vdsvax!barnett
From: barnett@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com (Bruce Barnett)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs
Subject: Re: Problem with Ease created sendmail.cf
Keywords: ease, sendmail, sendmail.cf
Message-ID: <7236@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com>
Date: 2 Mar 89 16:24:36 GMT
References: <11529@sequent.UUCP>
Sender: news@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com
Reply-To: barnett@vdsvax.steinmetz.ge.com (Bruce Barnett)
Organization: GE Corp. R & D, Schenectady, NY
Lines: 27
In-reply-to: bills@sequent.UUCP (Bill Sears)

In article <11529@sequent.UUCP>, bills@sequent (Bill Sears) writes:
>*****
>    I have compiled the Ease programs and have been running some tests on
>our sendmail.cf file and the sendmail.cf file that Ease created and have
>found some discrepancies.

I have been fixed Ease 2.0 for weeks now, and have fixed about
one hundred bugs. When ease 2.1 comes out, it will solve all of your
problems. (I hope).

I have tested cfc/ease 2.1, and consider the CFC/ease programs working
properly when the input to cfc is identical to the output of ease.

As far as I know, I have achieved this for the Berkeley, SunOS and Ultrix sendmails.
I have it working for most of the IDA sendmail enhancements.

>    Should Ease treat class 'S' specially also?

Ease 2.1 will select the same letter as the identifer if the
identifier is a single letter, and the letter has not already been
assigned to another identifier.

Class S is not special. I think it is a bug in CFC 2.0

--
	Bruce G. Barnett 	barnett@ge-crd.ARPA, barnett@steinmetz.ge.com
				uunet!steinmetz!barnett