Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!uunet!hsi!stpstn!aad From: aad@stpstn.UUCP (Anthony A. Datri) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.rt Subject: Re: Why is AIX not "useful"? (was "Re: BSD Unix on 6150-135?") Message-ID: <2870@stpstn.UUCP> Date: 5 Mar 89 01:31:55 GMT References: <2650@spdcc.SPDCC.COM> <583@jc3b21.UUCP> <2854@stpstn.UUCP> <9199@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> Reply-To: aad@stpstn.UUCP (Anthony A. Datri) Organization: The Stepstone Corporation, Sandy Hook, CT Lines: 32 In article <9199@orstcs.CS.ORST.EDU> fink@nucthy.PHYSICS.ORST.EDU (Paul Fink) writes: >I have no great love for RT's, but AIX is a fine System V Unix. If you don't >like the default partitioning change it. I have never installed a Unix, and >not reworked the partitioning. I figure that's my job. I have only set one RT >with AIX, others with BSD, The AIX machine was much easyer to setup. I agree that reworking the partitioning is a reasonable part of the installation. I would still prefer that it wouldn't spread the system partitions across two or three disks, but that's a preferences. What I was really commenting on was that the installation procedure left all that disk space unallocated. I think that a default behavior should set things up in some semi-reasonable way, and that while the option for customization is present, that if a user chooses not to use it (in my case, I didn't know I could) it should use disk space not allocated to system stuff for user directories, or even /foo. I would think that if someone is going to want to customize, they're going to do it from the start. Ie., someone with manuals who does a default installation probably isn't going to run the minidisks command to customize later. >Your using more that 16 ptys? Wow, that must be a slow moving RT. I used to hate RT's, but that was from experience on non-APC machines with 4 or so meg of memory at CMU running Andrew. The two we have here seem to have APC's and 16 meg of memory each. There are things I don't like about AIX, but I don't mind the machine itself. It seems reasonable, but then, I don't know how much IBM charges for them. I'd like to know why cc pegs the CPU, though. -- @disclaimer(Any concepts or opinions above are entirely mine, not those of my employer, my GIGI, my VT05, or my 11/34) beak is@>beak is not Anthony A. Datri @SysAdmin(Stepstone Corporation) aad@stepstone.com stpstn!aad