Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!uxc!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!uxg.cso.uiuc.edu!uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdonald
From: mcdonald@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: 400 dpi
Message-ID: <46100289@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 6 Mar 89 00:40:00 GMT
References: <491@sunset.MATH.UCLA.EDU>
Lines: 8
Nf-ID: #R:sunset.MATH.UCLA.EDU:491:uxe.cso.uiuc.edu:46100289:000:369
Nf-From: uxe.cso.uiuc.edu!mcdonald    Mar  5 18:40:00 1989


In article <491@sunset.MATH.UCLA.EDU> hgw@MATH.UCLA.EDU (Harold Wong) writes:
>Will the industry ever go to 400 dpi on scanners and printers?  Why is it that
>this is the only area where little is happening? 

I would certainly hope that 400 d.p.i printers DON'T catch on!
That is not enough - the next step should be 600 d.p.i., then
1200 - that would be good enough.