Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!oliveb!apple!bbn!bbn.com!mesard From: mesard@bbn.com (Wayne Mesard) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: IIcx intro (Mac II dead?) Message-ID: <37023@bbn.COM> Date: 9 Mar 89 15:38:25 GMT References: <3794@emory.mathcs.emory.edu> Sender: news@bbn.COM Reply-To: mesard@BBN.COM (Wayne Mesard) Organization: Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., Cambridge MA Lines: 16 In article <3794@emory.mathcs.emory.edu> phssra@emory.UUCP (Scott Robert Anderson) writes: >In article wb1j+@andrew.cmu.edu (William M. Bumgarner) writes: >>A Thought: What is the point of the Mac II? >>Did Apple just kill that Mac II? If so, does it really matter? > >I believe they did. Not if you're gonna need, e.g. a MacIvory system with tons o' memory. It's my understanding that the IIcx has 3 card slots vs. the II's 6. I'm working on two projects now where we'll be installing more than 3 cards. -- unsigned *Wayne_Mesard(); MESARD@BBN.COM BBN, Cambridge, MA