Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!netnews.upenn.edu!linc.cis.upenn.edu!rubinoff
From: rubinoff@linc.cis.upenn.edu (Robert Rubinoff)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: SuperPaint 2.0 impressions...
Message-ID: <8661@netnews.upenn.edu>
Date: 9 Mar 89 17:10:40 GMT
References: <5952@bsu-cs.UUCP> <9799@ihlpb.ATT.COM> <21373@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
Reply-To: rubinoff@linc.cis.upenn.edu.UUCP (Robert Rubinoff)
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 14

In article <21373@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> steve@violet.berkeley.edu (Steve Goldfield) writes:
>SuperPaint 2.0 is 516,017 bytes. 
>SuperPaint 1.0 was 165,034 bytes.
>However, the suggested memory size has increased from 582K to
>700K.


Although I would expect that you could cut down a little on the required 
memory by getting rid of any plug-in tools and commands that you aren't using.
There are a lot of them that are cute but not very important (like the ones 
that sprinkle stars or bubbles or various other things around the picture).
This still won't make the application file any smaller, of course.

   Robert