Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!nic.MR.NET!srcsip!gorby!mnkonar
From: mnkonar@gorby.SRC.Honeywell.COM (Murat N. Konar)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: The number 31 and Apple?
Message-ID: <18488@srcsip.UUCP>
Date: 11 Mar 89 00:54:00 GMT
References: <10330143@accuvax.nwu.edu> <901@internal.Apple.COM> <905@internal.Apple.COM> <3794@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>
Sender: news@src.honeywell.COM
Reply-To: mnkonar@gorby.UUCP (Murat N. Konar)
Organization: Honeywell Systems & Research Center, Camden, MN
Lines: 20

In article <3794@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> lim@iris.ucdavis.edu (Lloyd Lim) writes:
>
>I was sure that the reason 31 was not used was because someone released an
>April fools Tech Note #31 that was a parody of Tech Notes.  Then someone at
>Apple released a Tech Note of the same number that was even more ridiculous
>in response to make sure that everyone knew the first one was not written

It was TN-110.

>by Apple and was somebody's joke.  I'm sure this happened because I remember
>seeing it in the back of someone's book on Mac programming (Scott Kronick
>or someone?).

No, Scott Knaster in "Macintosh Programming Secrets"

 
______________________________________________________________________
Have a day. :^|
Murat N. Konar        Honeywell Systems & Research Center, Camden, MN
mnkonar@SRC.honeywell.com           (internet)