Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!husc6!endor!siegel
From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: LSC++?
Message-ID: <1365@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 9 Mar 89 05:04:47 GMT
References: <1791@viscous.sco.COM> <1330@husc6.harvard.edu> <7235@fluke.COM>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel)
Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA
Lines: 23

In article <7235@fluke.COM> mce@tc.fluke.COM (Brian McElhinney) writes:
>
>Why invent a new language?  Aren't you concerned about the acceptance of a

	Who said it was a new language? :-)

>Object C will have just enough extensions to work with programs written in
>Object Pascal (eg MacApp).  Certainly a wonderful thing!  It should also

	Correct. The way it exists now, it is to C what Object Pascal is
to Pascal. The implementation of Object C is also upward-compatible with
C++.

		--Rich



Rich Siegel
Staff Software Developer
THINK Technologies Division, Symantec Corp.
Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu
UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel
Phone: (617) 275-4800 x305