Xref: utzoo comp.unix.microport:2964 talk.rumors:2512
Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!rutgers!ucla-cs!cc1
From: cc1@valhalla.cs.ucla.edu (Max Kislik)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport,talk.rumors,comp.unix.i386
Subject: Re: Interactive (was uport death rumors)
Keywords: microport
Message-ID: <21589@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>
Date: 10 Mar 89 19:18:14 GMT
References: <285@swusrgrp.UUCP> <1652@trantor.harris-atd.com> <3422@ima.ima.isc.com> <140@cbw1.UUCP> <3445@ima.ima.isc.com>
Sender: news@CS.UCLA.EDU
Reply-To: cc1@cs.ucla.edu (Max Kislik)
Organization: UCLA Computer Club
Lines: 13

In article <3445@ima.ima.isc.com> trb@ima.UUCP (Andrew Tannenbaum) writes:
...

>My biased personal opinion follows:  I think 386/ix 2.0 is a really hot
>system for the bucks.  Way fast, with X11r3 support for decent
>monitors, networking, runs Xenix binaries, runs DOS applications
>including Flight Simulator, etc.  It might still have nits, but we're

...

What is 386/ix ?  Is it the new AIX from Locus or is it the other 386
UNIXl-like OS made by this other Santa Monica software developer whose
name I can't recall.