Xref: utzoo comp.unix.microport:2956 comp.unix.questions:12128 unix-pc.general:2420
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!zorch!pacbell!pbhyf!mal
From: mal@pbhyf.PacBell.COM (Martin A. Lodahl)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.microport,comp.unix.questions,unix-pc.general
Subject: Re: ct on SysV386 3.0Ue
Message-ID: <4818@pbhyf.PacBell.COM>
Date: 9 Mar 89 16:26:12 GMT
References: <584@pgthor.UUCP> <7475@killer.DALLAS.TX.US>
Reply-To: mal@pbhyf.PacBell.COM (Martin A. Lodahl)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Lines: 11

In article <7475@killer.DALLAS.TX.US> wnp@killer.Dallas.TX.US (Wolf Paul) writes:
>Can anyone confirm that ct works on any System V box? Or is it generally
>untested and probably not working?

Years ago we experimented with "ct" on a PDP11-70 implementation of SVr2.
I can't recall the details, but I do remember that each time it was
used, uucp was utterly disabled, requiring fairly substantial "cleanup".
Needless to say, we dropped it.
-- 
= Martin A. Lodahl    		 Pac*Bell Minicomputer Support Staff =
= {att,bellcore,sun,ames,pyramid}!pacbell!pbhyf!mal     916/972-4821 =