Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!helios.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!ncr-sd!greg
From: greg@ncr-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Greg Noel)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: Signals after exec
Message-ID: <986@ncr-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM>
Date: 3 Mar 89 01:51:21 GMT
References: <2071@lcuxlm.ATT.COM> <963@ncr-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM> <5025@xenna.Encore.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: NCR Corporation, Rancho Bernardo
Lines: 11

In article <5025@xenna.Encore.COM> aral@pinocchio.UUCP (Ziya Aral) writes:
>I will be happy to fill in any details if anyone is left awake.
>This should teach Greg NEVER to ask an author to "elaborate" on his work :-)

Er, no, it doesn't -- but it does bring us back to the initial topic, which
was, what happens if you have shared signals between two processes, but
separate address spaces?  How do the semantics of that work out?

-- Greg
-- 
-- Greg Noel, NCR Rancho Bernardo   Greg.Noel@SanDiego.NCR.COM  or  greg@ncr-sd