Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!rochester!rutgers!bellcore!faline!thumper!ulysses!andante!alice!debra
From: debra@alice.UUCP (Paul De Bra)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Out of Heap space error...
Message-ID: <9020@alice.UUCP>
Date: 9 Mar 89 15:34:10 GMT
References: <9016@alice.UUCP> <15@sherpa.UUCP>
Reply-To: debra@alice.UUCP ()
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T, Bell Labs
Lines: 20

In article <15@sherpa.UUCP> rac@sherpa.UUCP (Roger A. Cornelius) writes:
}...
}I've found recently that using the -LARGE option also eliminates
}the "function ??? too large for post optimizer" warning I sometimes
}get, so indirectly, the -LARGE option could affect the code generated
}in this case.  I only noticed this about a week ago, so I don't know
}if -LARGE will fix the "function too large" message in all cases.

True. The -LARGE option activates large-model programs for several
compiler-passes.
The "function too large for post optimizer" has always gone away with
the -LARGE option for me. But then again, maybe some people write even
larger functions than I do...

Paul.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------
|debra@research.att.com   | uunet!research!debra     |
------------------------------------------------------