Xref: utzoo comp.windows.x:8492 comp.unix.questions:12021 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!bbn!apple!voder!wlbr!mh From: mh@wlbr.EATON.COM (Mike Hoegeman) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x,comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: X Terminals for Sun hosts over dial up phone lines Message-ID: <27251@wlbr.EATON.COM> Date: 4 Mar 89 23:31:34 GMT References: <2566@antique.UUCP> <16083@mimsy.UUCP> <364@ists.ists.ca> <16174@mimsy.UUCP> Reply-To: mh@wlbr.eaton.com.UUCP (Mike Hoegeman) Organization: Eaton IMSD, Westlake Village, CA Lines: 17 In article <16174@mimsy.UUCP> alberto@tove.umd.edu.UUCP (Jose Alberto Fernandez R) writes: > The Idea of use POSTSCRIPT as the comunication Protocol is not a bad one. > Actually, there is not a tool as this for NeWS?, must be very easy to I think bruce schwartz made something like this for NeWS. check out the SEX tape (sun user group software exchange tape) or the NeWS stuff on tumtum.umd.edu > implement. I like the ideas of NeWS very much (was my first window > system), but the speed of the server make me change to X. I can't wait > forever and ever each time I move a window. I've found the Performance of NeWS to be just fine. What does "waiting forever and ever to paint, each time i move a window mean ?" sounds to me like you're not doing something right.