Xref: utzoo news.groups:7797 comp.windows.x:8520
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!ncar!woods
From: woods@ncar.ucar.edu (Greg Woods)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: comp.sys.andrew: NEW call for votes
Message-ID: <1529@ncar.ucar.edu>
Date: 7 Mar 89 01:16:31 GMT
References: <4Y4dPXy00Uk4Qp6GQ9@andrew.cmu.edu> <oY4h9yy00hYP10ClAH@cs.cmu.edu> <0Y4iHny00Uk40pGdsZ@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: woods@handies.UCAR.EDU (Greg Woods)
Organization: Scientific Computing Division/NCAR, Boulder CO
Lines: 12

In article <0Y4iHny00Uk40pGdsZ@andrew.cmu.edu> nsb+@andrew.cmu.edu (Nathaniel Borenstein) writes:
>I find it hard to imagine why any regular Andrew user would vote against
>having a newsgroup for discussions about Andrew. 

  Oh, so you were going to decide FOR them? This has been gone over time and
time again, and recently, too. There are MANY reasons why even someone 
interested in the topic could vote against a newsgroup for it.  Maybe they
LIKE having a mailing list instead of a newsgroup.
  To be fair, you have to be fair. You can't make it easier to vote the way
YOU think they should or will than the other way.

--Greg