Path: utzoo!censor!becker!ziebmef!cks
From: cks@ziebmef.uucp (Chris Siebenmann)
Newsgroups: can.general
Subject: Re: BYTE billing nonsense
Message-ID: <1989Mar18.215438.15817@ziebmef.uucp>
Date: 19 Mar 89 02:54:34 GMT
References: <1989Mar10.135659.2392@lsuc.uucp> <1989Mar12.151948.269@tmsoft.uucp> <4945@mnetor.UUCP>
Reply-To: cks@ziebmef.UUCP (Chris Siebenmann)
Distribution: can
Organization: Ziebmef Public Access Unix, Toronto, Ontario
Lines: 19

In article <4945@mnetor.UUCP> jim@mnetor.UUCP (Jim Stewart) writes:
| I didn't realize this was such an epidemic, I just stopped renewing
| Byte as well (after collecting them since the first one--its hard
| to break a set, otherwise I would have done it sooner).

 I suspect there's been a regular epidemic of people dropping or not
renewing BYTE subscriptions; I knew I wasn't going to renew when I saw
their full-page add trumpeting how they delivered more customers to
advertisers than their two major competitors -- two PClone magazines.

 In the mean time, does anyone know a good replacement for BYTE --
ie. generic leading-edge machines covered in a technical manner? If
one exists, I want to subscribe.

-- 
	"The hell I will!"	WHAK!	"Surpise, kid -- they retract!
	 Try that again and I'll kick you back. With my claws."
Chris Siebenmann		uunet!{utgpu!moore,attcan!telly}!ziebmef!cks
cks@ziebmef.UUCP	     or	.....!utgpu!{,ontmoh!,ncrcan!brambo!}cks