Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi From: dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Rahul Dhesi) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Commercial software in comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Message-ID: <6191@bsu-cs.UUCP> Date: 17 Mar 89 18:14:10 GMT Sender: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP Reply-To: Rahul Dhesi Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana Lines: 49 As moderator of comp.binaries.ibm.pc I am supposed to draw the line somewhere between what is suitable for posting and what is not. I am intending to draw the line between commercial software and free software as follows: Ok to post: Software that does not impose a legal requirement on the user to pay for it. Not OK to post: Software that does impose a legal requirement on the user to pay for it. Sample license (call this example A), not OK to post: "If you use this program beyond a trial period you are required to pay $x." Sample license (example B), OK to post: "If you find this software useful, a payment of $x is requested." Suppose we post software with a license like example A. A single posting might result in perhaps 10 or 15 registrations. In effect we have provided the software author with 10,000 copies of free advertising, for the sake of 10 or 15 sales. There may be hundreds of others using it, but they are using it illegally, and such illegal use is a factor against the posting, not in favor of it. Consider example B. Even if that posting too yields 10 or 15 registrations, there may be hundreds of others using it without payment. Since such use is not illegal, it is a factor in favor of the posting. Note that I don't care about a moral stand, e.g. "you *should* pay for it if you use it...if you do, everyone will benefit etc." That is a philosophical statement, not a legal requirement. It is outside the scope of my moderator's duty to judge the validity of such a moral stand or dictate the enforcement of it. Therefore, no matter how strong the moral statement, it doesn't matter, so long as it is not also a legal statement. This is tentative policy. Comments are welcome. I suggest brief comments with a minimum of quoted material. Email or post as you consider appropriate. If I get too many emailed comments I may not be able to reply individually but I will read all and file the good ones for future reference. -- Rahul Dhesi UUCP: !{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi ARPA: dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu