Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!charon!ariel.unm.edu!dd From: dd@ariel.unm.edu Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans Subject: Re: lanbridge retardation Message-ID: <4673@charon.unm.edu> Date: 20 Mar 89 14:55:29 GMT References: <1151@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> Sender: root@charon.unm.edu Reply-To: dd@ariel.unm.edu.UUCP () Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM Lines: 51 In article <1151@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> gdl@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU (Glen Lovell) writes: >Looking for help... Here at Hopkins we have 26 lanbridge 100's. Lately >we have seen occurences where all of them acquire a bogus forwarding >entry for the multicast address FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF to an invalid destination. > >Doing a remove known bridges address FF-FF-FF-FF-FF-FF with RBMS clears >the problem for a day or two, sometimes longer. I seem to recall some >discussion of this in this newsgroup eons ago. I have looked for an >offensive packet without success and my gut-level feeling is that is >a Lanbridge problem (possibly eco or firmware). Anyone have anything >of help? We have had this problem in spades also. There are two paths to take in solving the problem: [1] Find the thing generating the bogus packet. I have found that IBM PC/RTs running 4.3 BSD (not AIX) generate this packet. I have heard (no promises, and I haven't seen it) that Kinetics gateways can generate this packet also. You can localize the offender by noticing in which direction the LAN-100 is biased (assuming you have kept track of which interfaces are attached to which network). [2] Upgrade or downgrade your LAN-100s. Rev. level D LAN-100s do not suffer from this problem. Rev. level E bridges do. DEC says rev. level F (which is currently being shipped) does not, but I am not certain of this yet - after the bogus packet flows through our network, the rev. F bridge is in a strange state, and may or may not be working. I usually reset it anyway. Other helpful (probably obvious) hints: If your network is organized in a hierarchical fashion (ours is), then at those key points where the entire network could be brought to it's knees by this phenomenon, make sure you have a rev. D LAN-100. Write a COM script to do, on an automated basis, what you do manually when you suspect a problem, and run the script every few minutes. The script can contain recording actions, and/or corrective actions. If you are interested in locating the offender make sure you record all of the pertinent data ("sho kno bri for phy add ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff"). Good luck with this, and if there is anything I can do to be of further assistance, please let me know. Don Doerner UNM-CIRT 2701 Campus Blvd. NE Albuquerque, NM, 87131 (505) 277-8036 dd@ariel.unm.edu