Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!hubcap!gatech!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!agate!garnet.berkeley.edu!ked
From: ked@garnet.berkeley.edu (Earl H. Kinmonth)
Newsgroups: comp.misc
Subject: Re: vi-like
Message-ID: <21496@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: 11 Mar 89 06:13:31 GMT
References: <12406@dartvax.Dartmouth.EDU> <958@starfish.Convergent.COM> <2386@iscuva.ISCS.COM> <6961@phoenix.Princeton.EDU>
Sender: usenet@agate.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 11

In article <6961@phoenix.Princeton.EDU> eliot@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Eliot Handelman) writes:
>@ if I'm using somebody else's key bindings, I'm totally screwed.  Why is the
>@ sequence 'dw' to delete a word "unfriendly"?

If you are suffering from premature senility and have difficulty remembering
such complex concepts as

dw = delete word
cw = change word

it is a fairly trivial matter to have someone write a crib sheet for you.