Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!milano!titan!janssen@titan.sw.mcc.com
From: janssen@titan.sw.mcc.com (Bill Janssen)
Newsgroups: comp.software-eng
Subject: Re: Good Design Strategies <Was comments on comments>
Message-ID: <2145@titan.sw.mcc.com>
Date: 20 Mar 89 03:10:51 GMT
References: <4343@enea.se> <4574@hubcap.UUCP> <231@my6.sm.luth.se> <5016@xenna.Encore.COM>
Sender: janssen@titan.sw.mcc.com
Reply-To: janssen@titan.sw.mcc.com (Bill Janssen)
Organization: MCC Software Technology
Lines: 8
In-reply-to: pierson@mist (Dan Pierson)

Modula-3 and Turing both seem to be nice languages.  But I feel that we
are past the point where a language that has all the "good" SE features
can really be small and easy to learn.  We just know more about what
helps to build good code.  What we need is a language that can be learned
(and used) in steps, as a person learns the methodological steps that drive
each part of the language.

Bill