Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cwjcc!hal!ncoast!allbery
From: allbery@ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs
Subject: Re: screen bugs/features
Message-ID: <13473@ncoast.ORG>
Date: 14 Mar 89 02:25:44 GMT
References: <4318@drivax.DRI> <2800015@kailand>
Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon S. Allbery)
Followup-To: comp.sources.bugs
Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh
Lines: 33

As quoted from <2800015@kailand> by pwolfe@kailand.KAI.COM:
+---------------
| /* Written by davison@drivax.DRI in kailand:comp.sources.bugs */
| > In article <2800013@kailand> pwolfe@kailand.KAI.COM writes:
| > >The two different cursor movement commands after the two ClearScreen calls
| > >in ansi.c are correct.
| > 
| > have just called ClearScreen() which outputs the termcap variable  `cl'.
| > This variable by definition both homes the cursor and clears the screen.
| 
| On the BSD TERMCAP(5) manpage, "cl" is defined as "clear the screen".  It
| does not mention "and homes the cursor" anywhere.  Maybe on the terminal you
+---------------

Beg your pardon, but...

(1) Xenix termcap and Xenix and System V terminfo man pages all say that
    "cl" homes the cursor.

(2) If it doesn't, then why do even BSD termcaps (so you can't argue that SV
    != BSD, which is irrelevant anyway because all SV termcap stuff comes
    from BSD; AT&T endorses terminfo, PERIOD) output BOTH sequences for
    common terminals where it takes separate sequences to clear the screen
    and home the cursor (ex: all DEC terminals)?

I think this argument leaks somewhat.

++Brandon
-- 
Brandon S. Allbery, moderator of comp.sources.misc	     allbery@ncoast.org
uunet!hal.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery		    ncoast!allbery@hal.cwru.edu
      Send comp.sources.misc submissions to comp-sources-misc@<backbone>
NCoast Public Access UN*X - (216) 781-6201, 300/1200/2400 baud, login: makeuser