Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!ames!oliveb!apple!well!ewhac
From: ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Desktop publishing
Summary: Oh yeah...
Message-ID: <10976@well.UUCP>
Date: 15 Mar 89 07:17:53 GMT
References: <8903011852.AA16426@jade.berkeley.edu> <6193@columbia.edu> <10901@well.UUCP> <794@zehntel.UUCP> <10923@well.UUCP> <9803@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab)
Organization: MTV (Music TeleVision):  Mind rot a specialty.
Lines: 22
Quote: "What do batteries run on?"  -- Steve Wright

In article <9803@bloom-beacon.MIT.EDU> cthulhu@athena.mit.edu (Jim Reich) writes:
>In article <10923@well.UUCP> ewhac@well.UUCP (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) writes:
>>In article <794@zehntel.UUCP> donw@zehntel.UUCP (Don White) writes:
>>>       Leo, don't we have a solid base of desktop publishing programs [ ... ]
>>
>>	Not as far as I'm concerned.  [ ... ]
>
>But we DO have AmigaTeX, which
>is, as far as I can tell, the best implementation of TeX I have ever seen on
>any computer.  [ ... ]

	Oh yeah.  I forgot about AmigaTeX.  That is a very sTudLY package.

	However, I hear more about Mac DTP applications than I do about TeX
in general.  Why is this?  Is it because TeX is a daunting beast, and looks
like it's difficult to learn?  Hmmmm...

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
Leo L. Schwab -- The Guy in The Cape	INET: well!ewhac@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU
 \_ -_		Recumbent Bikes:	UUCP: pacbell > !{well,unicom}!ewhac
O----^o	      The Only Way To Fly.	      hplabs / (pronounced "AE-wack")
"Work FOR?  I don't work FOR anybody!  I'm just having fun."  -- The Doctor