Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!gatech!mcnc!rti!xyzzy!giants!poirier
From: poirier@giants.dg.com (Charles Poirier)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Switching to NewShell ..
Summary: Resident vs REZ
Message-ID: <4282@xyzzy.UUCP>
Date: 20 Mar 89 20:24:33 GMT
References: <8903090702.AA22197@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> <46187@linus.UUCP> <YY80zay00VsEQ0eN9e@andrew.cmu.edu>
Sender: usenet@xyzzy.UUCP
Reply-To: poirier@dg-rtp.dg.com (Charles Poirier)
Organization: Data General Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Lines: 12

In article <YY80zay00VsEQ0eN9e@andrew.cmu.edu> mp1u+@andrew.cmu.edu (Michael Portuesi) writes:
<eachus@mbunix.mitre.org (Robert Eachus) writes:
<>      I haven't found anything other than L:Shell-Seg and Execute that
<> need Resident, and I haven't checked whether it's just one of them.
<> 
<Nothing needs to be made Resident, but if you're using the Shell it's
<probably a better choice than RAD:C.

I assumed "need Resident" was meant in the sense that Goodnow's REZ
didn't like them but Resident did.  REZ usually accepts almost anything --
don't ask me why.

	Charles Poirier