Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ncrlnk!ncrcae!ece-csc!ncsuvx!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!PSUVM.BITNET!ART100
From: ART100@PSUVM.BITNET ("Andy Tefft  862-6728", 814)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: 2400 baud (was Re: Shrinkit 1.0)
Message-ID: <8903132028.aa04779@SMOKE.BRL.MIL>
Date: 13 Mar 89 16:18:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 12

EST

Original note:
>
>I've used a 1200 at home and a 2400 at work for some time now.  The
>difference (2 to 1) IS NOT as noticeable as the difference between 300
>and 1200 (4 to 1).  In fact, since I can neither read nor type at 120
>characters a second, I haven't found the greater speed of 2400 worth the
>$$$ to upgrade my modem at home (I'll be tempted once I see a really

Hmmm... don't you use full-screen cms? Twice as fast for screen refreshes
i