Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!ames!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!moravian.EDU!nicholaA From: nicholaA@moravian.EDU Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: why Finder replaced Desktop; large HDs Message-ID: <8903171135.AA18592@batman.moravian.edu> Date: 17 Mar 89 11:35:25 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 63 Dave Lyons = >> Kareth = > >>EH? GS/OS is perfectly "true" right now. Partitions are not limited >I shudda had a fst after GS/OS. Further explanation at bottom. >>to 32 Megs except under ProDOS. If and when FSTs are available for >Which is all we have cept for a High Sierra. >>non-ProDOS file systems (other than High Sierra, which intended for >>compact disks and is read-only), there is no reason to doubt that >>the current SCSI card will be able to handle them. It requires a >>loaded driver (SCSI.DRIVER) anyway, so I don't forsee any problems. >Okay, sounds good. >>By the way, the ProDOS FST (PRO.FST) _is_ a "real GS/OS FST." All >>FSTs impose file-system-specific limitations on things like volume >>size, file size, valid characters in filenames, maximum length of >>filenames, etc. >Okay, picky, picky :-) I didn't mean PRO.FST wasn't a real GS/OS fst. >I meant it doesn't support everything GS/OS can. In a sense, PRO.FST might >be considered to be a foreign translator, that unfortunately, we have >to use until we get our native translator, GSOS.FST. I understand the >other stuff, guess I just didn't make myself clear. Um, no... the ProDOS File System Translator (FST) provided with GS/OS 2.0 on System Disk 4.0 *IS* a native translator. It's as native as we'll have for a while because ProDOS has been the native filing system for the Apple II for 5 years now. The FST itself is written (from what I understand at the briefing given at AppleFest to the public by Rob Turner, the guy who wrote it) in all 65816 code, unlike the previous ProDOS/16, which had a core of ProDOS/8 through which it passed calls. I don't think we're looking for a "GSOS.FST" -- what we're looking for is the Hierarchical Filing System FST (HFS FST) and AppleShare FST. Even without those 2 FST's, I don't think that GS/OS can be faulted for not having a "native" FST. It does. It's ProDOS. As far as an FST which could provide everything that GS/OS allows for -- I don't think the filing system yet exists that can press GS/OS to it's absolute limits. Perhaps I am wrong, but the HFS FST will probably come closest if anything can. After all, the maximum size for a volume under HFS is 4 Gigabytes, right? I believe that "System 7.0" on the Mac is supposed to finally catch up to where we are with GS/OS with File System Translators built into the OS, correct? >kareth. andy ---- Andy Nicholas CsNET: shrinkit@moravian.edu Box 435, Moravian College InterNET: shrinkit%moravian.edu@relay.cs.net Bethlehem, PA 18018 liberty!batman!shrinkit@sun.com ---- UUCP: rutgers!lafcol!lehi3b15!mc70!shrinkit I have a CD player, send CD's. rutgers!liberty!batman!shrinkit I have a IIgs, send a GS+. ALink PE: shrinkit