Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: MacWeek pans the Apple II
Message-ID: <9885@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 20 Mar 89 10:27:30 GMT
References: <8903182055.aa02142@SMOKE.BRL.MIL> <9106@claris.com>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 11

In article <9106@claris.com> krazy@claris.com (Jeff Erickson) writes:
-The rumor was that MacWeek is going to publish an article/editorial/story
-on the obsolescence of the Apple II.  This would mean, naturaly, that at
-least one indicator of the Mac community thinks the II >should< be killed
-off.

And if an IBM PC mag prints a story about the obsolescence of the Mac,
we should pay attention to IT, too?

We already know that Mac enthusiasts don't think much of the Apple II.
So what's new?