Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!pprg.unm.edu!hc!lanl!jss%seraphim.c3
From: jss%seraphim.c3@lanl.gov (Jeffrey Saltzman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: (La)TeX for the Mac
Message-ID: <10348@lanl.gov>
Date: 11 Mar 89 15:52:27 GMT
References: <11985@haddock.ima.isc.com>
Sender: news@lanl.gov
Lines: 21

From article <11985@haddock.ima.isc.com>, by suitti@haddock.ima.isc.com (Stephen Uitti):
> Textures was not worth the space on my hard disk, let alone the
> money they were asking for it.  Your mileage may vary.
> 
> Stephen Uitti	suitti@ima.ima.isc.com
> disclaimer: I don't speak for anyone.

From a mathematician's point of view (mine!), TeX is still the best
way of writing mathematics.  I am sure it also has much appeal to
computer scientists as it is a programming language allowing them
to roll their own document designs.  The old refrain still holds.  
What You See is What You Get really mean What You See is All You Get.
I have been using TeXtures for some time and although it is a bit
pricy, I have been getting my money's worth out of it.

Jeffrey Saltzman 
   jss@lanl.gov
   Los Alamos National Laboratory

disclaimer: I use TeXtures but I don't have any affiliation with
	    Blue Sky Research.