Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!munnari!basser!natmlab!ipso!appleoz!ksand From: ksand@appleoz.oz.au ( A/UX Support) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac,aus.mac Subject: Re: Mac IIcx Message-ID: <510@appleoz.oz.au> Date: 19 Mar 89 05:10:27 GMT References: <851@tasis.utas.oz> <951@anucsd.oz> Reply-To: ksand@appleoz.oz.AU (Kent Sandvik - A/UX Support) Organization: A/UX Support, Apple Australia Lines: 39 In article <951@anucsd.oz> drew@anucsd.oz (Drew Corrigan) writes: >in article <851@tasis.utas.oz>, ben@tasis.utas.oz (Ben Lian) says: >This past Wednesday and Thursday I had the opportunity to visit the 1989 >Apple Forums held at the Canberra Hyatt, Tuesday to Thursday. Most impressive! >(At least to someone who has never managed to get to a MacWorld Expo, sigh.) > >The professionalism of the entire thing was very high. The seminars (that I >attended) were generally of an excellent standard, with live demonstrations. Thx, the guys here at the office will love this (they worked quite hard for the show...). >I hope this roadshow (its going to most capital cities - don't know about >Hobart - haven't got my pamphlet here at the moment) proves to be very good >for Apple sales over the coming year. (I say this as a Mac enthusiast of >course!) It's in Sydney next week, 20-23 March. Other cities that the roadshow will visit are Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Perth. Sorry, not Hobart this time. >> the 'totability' of the SE/30, it seems to me that the IIcx is somewhat >> better value for money. Or is it? SE/30 and IIcx are two different concepts, SE/30 is a compact model, whereas IIcx is a modular unit. Both are needed out on the market place. If I would decide upon any of these, I would look at what are my requirements, modular upgrade facilities, or a moveable unit. Reg, Kent PS: I would take a IIcx, because then I could later buy a MIDI synth DSP card. -- Kent Sandvik - Apple Australia *NET: ksand@appleoz.oz.AU APPLELINK: AUSTAUX "UNIX is dead - OS/2 will take over the _multiuser_ market" -said by Phil Dorn on a UNIX conference 1987