Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!gfx
From: GFX@PSUVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
Subject: Re: Compiled HC code
Message-ID: <75623GFX@PSUVM>
Date: 12 Mar 89 15:21:08 GMT
References: <5966@bsu-cs.UUCP> <990@taurus.BITNET> <75141GFX@PSUVM> <4634@charon.unm.edu> <6655@saturn.ucsc.edu>
Organization: Penn State University - Center for Academic Computing
Lines: 7

I had written a set of HC matrix operators last year and will gladly send it
to anyone who would like to volunteer to compile and benchmark the execution
speed.  The interpreted version works but is so slow that it is totally useless
for anykind of application beside demonstrating a regression procedure, step
by step.  I am very curious as to whether compiled HC code can provide a
feasible alternative to XFCNs.  (I'd send a 9K Binhexed mono-card stack)
Stephane