Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!pyramid!csg
From: csg@pyramid.pyramid.com (Carl S. Gutekunst)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sequent
Subject: Re: Sequent vs. NeXT
Message-ID: <63157@pyramid.pyramid.com>
Date: 19 Mar 89 06:21:06 GMT
References: <16000001@uxg.cso.uiuc.edu>
Reply-To: csg@pyramid.pyramid.com (Carl S. Gutekunst)
Organization: Pyramid Technology Corp., Mountain View, CA
Lines: 8

>If Sequent tries to upstage NeXT, will they call it "SubSequent"?

Oh, come now. On the balance of things, regardless of who's next, any attempt
to establish a dynixty will be inconsequential.

Or am I just being pyranoid?

<csg>