Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!amdahl!ames!mailrus!sharkey!bnlux0!abrams
From: abrams@bnlux0.bnl.gov (The Ancient Programmer)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: junk ->/dev/null
Message-ID: <1079@bnlux0.bnl.gov>
Date: 10 Mar 89 21:46:35 GMT
References: <1075@bnlux0.bnl.gov> <978@mailrus.cc.umich.edu>
Reply-To: abrams@bnlux0.UUCP (The Ancient Programmer)
Distribution: na
Organization: Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, N.Y.
Lines: 18

In article <978@mailrus.cc.umich.edu> wisner@mailrus.cc.umich.edu (Bill Wisner) writes:
>Why not just run expire nightly with a 1 day expiry for junk? Similar
>effect, no risk.
	Great idea. Thanks.
	Expire does not allow for something like:
expire -n junk -e 1 -E 15 -n all -e 15 
					does it?  Or should I fire up
another expire at a time when it would not collide with the "normal" expire?
Two expires, running at the same time does not sound like a great idea.





-- 
INTERNET:	abrams@bnlux0.bnl.gov
BITNET:		abrams@bnlux0.BITNET
UUCP:		...philabs!sbcs!bnlux0!abrams