Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!bu-cs!bloom-beacon!apple!vsi1!lmb
From: lmb@vicom.COM (Larry Blair)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: CANCELL/DISREGARD CALL FOR VOTES ON COMP.INTERNET* **DEAD ISSUE**
Message-ID: <1565@vicom.COM>
Date: 14 Mar 89 18:07:26 GMT
References: <2082@pikes.Colorado.EDU>
Reply-To: lmb@vicom.COM (Larry Blair)
Organization: VICOM Systems Inc., San Jose, CA
Lines: 12

In article <2082@pikes.Colorado.EDU> netnews@pikes.Colorado.EDU (Usenet News) writes:
=Please disregard any further discussion regarding Comp.internet and comp.
=internet.addr.  The general census is NOT to have such a group or groups
=as the comp.protocols.tcp-ip group covers much of the discussion and most
=sites seem to be running the name-server.

I would like to point out that if there had been a period of discussion
before calling for the vote, the point would have been made then and the
vote never would have taken place.  How can you have a vote on an undiscussed
issue?
-- 
Larry Blair   ames!vsi1!lmb   lmb@vicom.com