Xref: utzoo news.groups:8066 news.admin:5140 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!ucla-cs!cc1 From: cc1@valhalla.cs.ucla.edu (It glows in the dark) Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin Subject: Re: Results of survey on expansion of rec.humor.funny to other networks Message-ID: <21867@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> Date: 16 Mar 89 21:05:18 GMT References: <2914@looking.UUCP> <1581@etive.ed.ac.uk> Sender: news@CS.UCLA.EDU Reply-To: cc1@cs.ucla.edu (It glows in the dark) Organization: Softly glowing nimrods Lines: 19 In article karl@triceratops.cis.ohio-state.edu (Karl Kleinpaste) writes: ^jha@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Jamie Andrews) writes: ^ Oh come on, Brad. Please admit that most of these votes ^ came from the rec.humor.funny readership... ^Considering that the readership/postership of r.h.f is exactly the set ^of people with whom lies the significance of any policy regarding ^re-posting on Genie/Delphi/wherever, it seems to me that he picked his ^sample population quite well. But what about the people who have to SEND all these jokes across the net to Brad so that he can make money off of it? Why not voting in news.admin? (Of course, since the number of rec.humor.funny readers undoubtedly outnumbers the number of news administrators, the newsadmins would lose out every time if a vote is taken--however, they DO have the power to drop r.h.f...) --Ken