Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!rutgers!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!b.gp.cs.cmu.edu!Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU
From: Ralf.Brown@B.GP.CS.CMU.EDU
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: National Space Council (from: What's New )
Message-ID: <241920f4@ralf>
Date: 11 Mar 89 13:36:52 GMT
Sender: ralf@b.gp.cs.cmu.edu
Lines: 13
In-Reply-To: <1989Mar10.174706.860@utzoo.uucp>

In article <1989Mar10.174706.860@utzoo.uucp>, henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
}I agree that the proposed NSC lineup does not sound impressive, but for
}different reasons:  it incorporates too many high-level bureaucrats who
}will be unable to meet frequently, meaning that it will have a hard time
}getting anything done.

Should we count that as a blessing?

--
UUCP: {ucbvax,harvard}!cs.cmu.edu!ralf -=-=-=- Voice: (412) 268-3053 (school)
ARPA: ralf@cs.cmu.edu  BIT: ralf%cs.cmu.edu@CMUCCVMA  FIDO: Ralf Brown 1:129/31
			Disclaimer? I claimed something?
	You cannot achieve the impossible without attempting the absurd.