Newsgroups: sci.space
Path: utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer)
Subject: Re: Sanger
Message-ID: <1989Mar15.171229.22272@utzoo.uucp>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
References: <1989Mar14.172237.29235@cs.rochester.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 89 17:12:29 GMT

In article <1989Mar14.172237.29235@cs.rochester.edu> dietz@cs.rochester.edu (Paul Dietz) writes:
>Science reports that the West German government has decided to fund
>initial work on Sanger... turboramjet engines to propel a winged
>first stage to Mach 5, at which point a LOX/LH2 propelled second stage
>... would be released to ascend to orbit.
>
>This seems like a better idea than HOTOL or NASP: no need to take the
>entire vehicle to orbit or to make the first stage capable of flight
>at extreme hypersonic speeds.

Uh, well, provided you don't call Mach 5 "extreme".  Sanger has been
presented as a more modest, technologically straightforward alternative 
to Hotol, but that first stage doesn't sound modest or straightforward
to me.  The last big hypersonic aircraft was the XB-70, which was only
built for Mach 3 and was still mind-bogglingly difficult and costly.
-- 
Welcome to Mars!  Your         |     Henry Spencer at U of Toronto Zoology
passport and visa, comrade?    | uunet!attcan!utzoo!henry henry@zoo.toronto.edu