Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!ubc-cs!van-bc!uunet!microsoft!w-colinp
From: w-colinp@microsoft.UUCP (Colin Plumb)
Newsgroups: can.general
Subject: Re: BYTE billing nonsense
Message-ID: <8@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 21 Mar 89 03:30:31 GMT
References: <1989Mar10.135659.2392@lsuc.uucp> <1989Mar12.151948.269@tmsoft.uucp> <4945@mnetor.UUCP> <1989Mar18.215438.15817@ziebmef.uucp>
Reply-To: w-colinp@microsoft.uucp (Colin Plumb)
Distribution: can
Organization: very little
Lines: 18

cks@ziebmef.UUCP (Chris Siebenmann) wrote:
>  In the mean time, does anyone know a good replacement for BYTE --
> ie. generic leading-edge machines covered in a technical manner? If
> one exists, I want to subscribe.

H'm... the Micro Cornucopia is pretty reasonable, and the variety of stuff
that makes in into the magazine put out by the C User's Group is pretty
amazing.  "Leading-edge machines" is a tricky one to define.  Do you want
supercomputers, mainframes, minis, high-end workstations, low-end workstations,
high-end PC's, low-end PC's, 8-bit PC's, what?

Microsoft's library is full of magazines that cover the general area, although
with a strong IBM-clone leaning.  (Anyplace that subscribes to 2600 can't be
all bad! :-})  If you have some idea, I'd be happy to go looking.
-- 
	-Colin (uunet!microsoft!w-colinp)

"Don't listen to me.  I never do." - The Doctor