Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!sun.soe.clarkson.edu!spam
From: spam@sun.soe!clutx.clarkson.edu (Roger Gonzalez,,,)
Newsgroups: comp.ai.neural-nets
Subject: S. Pinker / A. Prince
Message-ID: <2726@sun.soe.clarkson.edu>
Date: 22 Mar 89 21:59:26 GMT
Sender: news@sun.soe.clarkson.edu
Reply-To: spam@clutx.clarkson.edu
Lines: 10

I just read a rather scathing article by Steven Pinker (MIT) and
Alan Prince (Brandeis) that tore PDP apart.  Has anyone seen any
responses to this article that defend Rumelhart and McClelland?
The article bummed me out, and I'm not up enough on language
processing to really debate what they claim.

++ Roger Gonzalez ++ spam@clutx.clarkson.edu ++ Clarkson University ++

   "Just like I've always said; there's nothing an agnostic can't do
    if he's not sure he believes in anything or not!" - Monty Python