Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!xanth!nic.MR.NET!srcsip!klemmer!vestal
From: vestal@klemmer.SRC.Honeywell.COM (Steve Vestal)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: foreign langauage requirements
Message-ID: <19205@srcsip.UUCP>
Date: 22 Mar 89 13:43:25 GMT
References: <1277@blake.acs.washington.edu> <22101@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU>
Sender: news@src.honeywell.COM
Lines: 7
In-reply-to: loving@lanai.cs.ucla.edu's message of 22 Mar 89 05:11:15 GMT

>In article <22101@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> loving@lanai.cs.ucla.edu (Mike Loving) writes:
>   In article <1277@blake.acs.washington.edu> robert@blake.acs.washington.edu (Gedankenleere) writes:
>   >. . . an UNSCIENTIFICALLY UNSOUND SURVERY!!
>   What does this mean?
That's what the rabble does.  We professionals do *scientifically* unsound
work, also variously called a SWAG, guestimate, or conjecture (depending on
the audience).