Xref: utzoo comp.dcom.modems:3610 comp.protocols.appletalk:1688 comp.sys.mac:28779
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!xanth!lll-winken!uunet!microsoft!w-colinp
From: w-colinp@microsoft.UUCP (Colin Plumb)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.protocols.appletalk,comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Liason network bridges vs. Telebit TrailBlazer Plus modems
Message-ID: <11@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 21 Mar 89 04:34:26 GMT
References: <22320@coherent.com> <1422@ccnysci.UUCP> <411@isl.stanford.edu>
Reply-To: w-colinp@microsoft.uucp (Colin Plumb)
Organization: very little
Lines: 14

dudevoir@isl.stanford.edu (Glen P. Dudevoir) wrote:
> You haven't explained why the modems are not at risk.  If the &w
> command is given once a minute to insure that the modem autobauds then
> the result predicted in the column is correct.  I should also point
> out that the same is true for Hayes modems.  Either the software gives
> the &w command once a minute or it doesn't.  Which is it?

It doesn't.  As he said, the &w command is given once per reboot.
(I believe Hayes uses battery backup rather than EEPROM, so infinite
rewrites are possible.)
-- 
	-Colin (uunet!microsoft!w-colinp)

"Don't listen to me.  I never do." - The Doctor