Path: utzoo!utgpu!utstat!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!ames!elroy!gryphon!vector!telecom-gateway From: wb8foz@cucstud.uucp (David Lesher) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: More CPID Message-ID: Date: 21 Mar 89 03:10:23 GMT Sender: news@vector.UUCP Reply-To: wb8foz@cucstud.UUCP (David Lesher,Guest) Organization: guest of Columbia Union College; Takoma Park, MD 20912 Lines: 12 Approved: telecom-request@vector.uucp X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.uucp X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 101, message 2 of 4 I do agree it looks like a quandry with the CPID issue. But I have a few thoughts... 1) Count on the BOCs soaking everybody involved for this {dis}service. They have been looking ever since 84 for anything and everything they can charge extra for. Have you priced a leased line recently? 2) With the US Post Office, you can have a private mail receipt address, UNLESS you solicit $$$$ from John Q. Public. Then, John Q can demand the street address of your boiler room. Why not require business class service to have ANI? Then I least I can trace that damm auto announce machine that called up all 30 trunks at work one night, one after another.