Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!elroy!gryphon!vector!telecom-gateway From: mtdca!royc@att.att.com Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Calling Party ID Suspension Message-ID: Date: 22 Mar 89 23:56:37 GMT Sender: news@vector.UUCP Organization: AT&T Lines: 19 Approved: telecom-request@vector.uucp X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@vector.uucp X-TELECOM-Digest: volume 9, issue 103, message 3 of 4 My earlier posting had a typographical error in it; as bad as the scene of my divorce is, I do not want to inaccurately blind side someone who cannot talk back: In article , att!mtdca!royc@research.att.com writes: [elided] > Yah. Judges have been known to make somewhat less than sanguine decisions; > such as having a three year old travel 3.5 hours round trip for a two > hour visitation. (OH, I could go on). But they are also human, and > prone to all of the ailments involved. Getting the apporpriate [elided] The figure I wanted was 2.5 hours: from 96th Street in Manhattan to the Homdel region of NJ, plus return, by car. Minimum of 2.5 hours (maybe 2:15 if you push the speed limit). roy a. crabtree att!mtdca!royc 201-957-6033