Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-winken!uunet!grand!day
From: day@grand.UUCP (Dave Yost)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel
Subject: Re: Multi-branch instructions and unique values (Version 2.2 preview)
Message-ID: <485@grand.UUCP>
Date: 23 Mar 89 17:20:29 GMT
References: <122@eiffel.UUCP> <4377@enea.se> <130@eiffel.UUCP>
Reply-To: day@grand.UUCP (Dave Yost)
Organization: Grand Software, Inc., Los Angels, CA 213-650-1089
Lines: 12

In article <130@eiffel.UUCP> bertrand@eiffel.UUCP (Bertrand Meyer) writes:
>    I also considered in detail Mr. Sommarskog's arguments in favor of an
>optional ``else'' clause and I think he is right. The mechanism will
>be emended accordingly. An exception will still be raised if no ``else''

My hat off to you for being so available, responsive,
candid, and open to suggestion in this public forum,
as in this random example.  Very refreshing.
May you not become *so* swamped with customers that
you can't keep it up.

 --dave yost