Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!bloom-beacon!oberon!ucla-cs!sm.unisys.com!randvax!leverich
From: leverich@randvax.UUCP (Brian Leverich)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.scheme
Subject: SPEED OF TI's PC-SCHEME, EXPANDED AND EXTENDED MEMORY VERSIONS
Message-ID: <1917@randvax.UUCP>
Date: 24 Mar 89 14:41:13 GMT
Reply-To: leverich@rand-unix.UUCP (Brian Leverich)
Organization: RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA
Lines: 15


Has anyone done timing runs of both the expanded and extended memory
versions of TI's PC-Scheme?  Is one version faster than the other?

Also, are there any programming tricks you can use to speed up the
large-memory versions?  Using PC-Scheme 3.03, I'm suffering an almost
tripling of run times when I use the extended memory version...
(Sure is nice having the big heap space, though!)

Tnx in advance.  -B
-- 
  "Simulate it in ROSS"
  Brian Leverich                       | U.S. Snail: 1700 Main St.
  ARPAnet:     leverich@rand-unix      |             Santa Monica, CA 90406
  UUCP/usenet: decvax!randvax!leverich | Ma Bell:    (213) 393-0411 X7769