Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!eecae!tank!shamash!raspail!steve
From: steve@raspail.cdcnet.cdc.com (Steve Schonberger)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: rulesets after resolved in ruleset 0
Message-ID: <1667@raspail.cdcnet.cdc.com>
Date: 24 Mar 89 18:40:26 GMT
References: <44@crdgw1.crd.ge.com> <8119@csli.STANFORD.EDU> <2615@decuac.DEC.COM> <1181@ur-cc.UUCP>
Organization: Control Data Corporation, Arden Hills, MN
Lines: 19

In article <1181@ur-cc.UUCP>, msir@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Mark Sirota) writes:
> [...]               (Note that this takes advantage of the IDA feature
> that -bt does not automatically call S3 first.  It's more challenging
> without this.

A simple way to avoid calling S3 first with plain sendmail is to do this
in your test configuration file:

	S3
	S49
	# what's usually in S3 follows

This causes S3 to become a do-nothing rule, and calling a do-nothing S3
first is as good as not doing S3.  If you want to do S3 for real, just
ask for S49 instead, until you get the configuration working, when you
can remove the S49 line.  (There's no magic significance about 49, that's
just the highest rule number my copy of sendmail allows.)

	Steve Schonberger	steve@raspail.cdcnet.cdc.com