Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!pprg.unm.edu!hc!lll-winken!snll-arpagw!paolucci
From: paolucci@snll-arpagw.UUCP (Sam Paolucci)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: AmigaDos vs Unix wildcards/pathnames
Message-ID: <78@snll-arpagw.UUCP>
Date: 20 Mar 89 23:39:32 GMT
References: <352@sagpd1.UUCP> <6294@cbmvax.UUCP> <11242@ut-emx.UUCP> <75@snll-arpagw.UUCP> <3652@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Reply-To: paolucci@snll-arpagw.UUCP (Sam Paolucci)
Organization: Sandia National Labs, Livermore, CA
Lines: 26

In article <3652@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes:
->In article <75@snll-arpagw.UUCP>, paolucci@snll-arpagw.UUCP (Sam Paolucci) writes:
->> Your statement must be based on an observation of a particular (simple)
->> window manager.
->
->I think it is advisable to judge a system based on the default behavior. The
->default X-windows window manager is rather lacking in user-friendliness.

What is the default window manager in X-Windows?  Is it wm or uwm, or is it
the freely available twm?  Or maybe if you have a DEC machine it is the
current DEC window manager, or maybe if you have an HP machine ...

I hope you get my point.  All of the above window manager are fairly
different.  So in X-Windows in general the standard window manager is
the one you get from your machine's manufacturer, or any of the free
ones.

->Peter "Have you hugged your wolf today" da Silva      `-_-'
->...texbell!sugar!peter, or peter@sugar.hackercorp.com  'U`


-- 
					-+= SAM =+-
"the best things in life are free"

				ARPA: paolucci@snll-arpagw.llnl.gov