Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!pdn!boake2!jc3b21!david
From: david@jc3b21.UUCP (David Quarles)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: APPLE ][  ...  vs  MAC  ... why ??
Message-ID: <608@jc3b21.UUCP>
Date: 24 Mar 89 05:37:31 GMT
References: <9144@claris.com>
Organization: St. Petersburg Jr. College, FL
Lines: 16

From article <9144@claris.com>, by wombat@claris.com (Scott Lindsey):
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> But obviously, some machines are better at doing some things than others.

	AGREED!  THAT'S WHY I USE BOTH ... 

> The other problem is that the average user CAN'T get one of each.  S/He can
> only afford 1 machine & must dedicate all computing resources to it.  That's
> why the big debate.

	WELL, OKAY.  BUT IT LOOKS LIKE (ACCORDING TO A POST A FEW
	NUMBERS ABOVE SCOTT'S AND THE 21 MARCH 89 ISSUE OF MACWEEK), THAT
	ALL THIS DEBATE WILL GRADUALLY COME TO A CLOSE IF WHAT HAS BEEN
	QUOTED IS TO COME TO PASS ...

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dave =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= EOT