Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!TRINCC.BITNET!REWING
From: REWING@TRINCC.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple
Subject: Re: MacWeek article (NOT a rumor!)
Message-ID: <8903230404.aa11565@SMOKE.BRL.MIL>
Date: 23 Mar 89 03:52:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 11

I've read the article, and I can't speak forKevin Harvey's statements,
but I think I can say that most of the MacWeek article belongs on the
back page (Mac the Knife) rather than page 1, and cannot be considered
credible fact.  MacWeek has seemed to have a vindetta against the
Apple II series, for reasons I'm not sure.  Why that a mac magazine
must print such damaging statements against another Apple computer
is beyond me.  As with all trade rags, i have grown to analyze any
MacWeek article discussing "futures", with a kilo of salt.  Remember:
Don't believe everything you read.
--Rick Ewing
  Apple Atlanta Tech Support